HomeSlots › Burning Coins
Endorphina

Burning Coins Slot Review

★★★★★ 4.5 / 5 — our rating
ESReviewed by Elin Sundqvist, Casino Analyst · Updated 18 Aug 2026
RTP
96.05%
Volatility
High
Max Win
Provider
Endorphina

A jackpot chase drives Burning Coins, Endorphina's fiery spin on the classic coin slot. The RTP sits at 96.05%, a shade above the industry midpoint. Volatility runs high, so wins land in bursts rather than a steady drip — expect dry stretches between the swings that put the jackpot within reach.

How Burning Coins plays

Expect swings from Burning Coins. High volatility means the base game can feel thin, with the real damage — in both directions — done when the features finally land.

Is 96.05% a good RTP?

96.05% puts Burning Coins right on the industry standard of around 96% — a fair, typical return with no nasty surprises in the maths. Bear in mind RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a promise for any single session.

Who should play it

Burning Coins is aimed at players who chase the big multiplier and can stomach the dry spells to get there. If losing streaks tilt you, a lower-variance title on this list will feel better.

What we liked

  • Solid 96.05% RTP, at or above standard
  • Bigger, less frequent wins (high volatility)
  • From Endorphina, a studio we rate

Worth knowing

  • High-volatility play: swings can be sharp — bankroll accordingly
  • Base-game pays can feel thin between features

Want to try Burning Coins in demo or real-money mode?

Play at Casumo →

Frequently asked questions

What is the RTP of Burning Coins?
Burning Coins has a published return-to-player (RTP) of 96.05%.
What is the volatility of Burning Coins?
Burning Coins is a high-volatility slot, meaning bigger, less frequent wins.
Who makes Burning Coins?
Burning Coins is developed by Endorphina.

How we review: we verify each game's RTP, volatility and maximum win against provider data, then assess variance, features and value. Ratings reflect our editorial judgement, not commercial arrangements. Read our full methodology →