HomeSlots › Chance Machine 40
Endorphina

Chance Machine 40 Slot Review

★★★★ 4.4 / 5 — our rating
MBReviewed by Marco Bianchi, Games Reviewer · Updated 12 Aug 2026
RTP
96.06%
Volatility
Medium
Max Win
Provider
Endorphina

Classic fruit symbols and a retro layout define Chance Machine 40, Endorphina's entry in the traditional slot genre. RTP is 96.06%, just above the 96% average. Volatility sits at medium, so payouts balance frequency against size — the familiar rhythm of an old-school fruit machine rather than a swingy modern release.

How Chance Machine 40 plays

Chance Machine 40 runs a balanced medium-variance profile, the pacing most players default to. Wins arrive often enough to keep a session alive without the punishing droughts of a high-variance title.

Is 96.06% a good RTP?

96.06% puts Chance Machine 40 right on the industry standard of around 96% — a fair, typical return with no nasty surprises in the maths. Bear in mind RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a promise for any single session.

Who should play it

Chance Machine 40 is an easy all-rounder — enough action for most players without demanding a specialist's bankroll or nerve. A sensible pick if you're not chasing extremes in either direction.

What we liked

  • Solid 96.06% RTP, at or above standard
  • A balanced rhythm of pays (medium volatility)
  • From Endorphina, a studio we rate

Worth knowing

  • Medium-volatility play: neither the calmest nor the wildest ride
  • Bonus features can be slow to trigger

Want to try Chance Machine 40 in demo or real-money mode?

Play at Casumo →

Frequently asked questions

What is the RTP of Chance Machine 40?
Chance Machine 40 has a published return-to-player (RTP) of 96.06%.
What is the volatility of Chance Machine 40?
Chance Machine 40 is a medium-volatility slot, meaning a balanced rhythm of pays.
Who makes Chance Machine 40?
Chance Machine 40 is developed by Endorphina.

How we review: we verify each game's RTP, volatility and maximum win against provider data, then assess variance, features and value. Ratings reflect our editorial judgement, not commercial arrangements. Read our full methodology →