HomeSlots › Chupito De Pollo 2
BGaming

Chupito De Pollo 2 Slot Review

★★★★★ 4.7 / 5 — our rating
ESReviewed by Elin Sundqvist, Casino Analyst · Updated 12 Aug 2026
RTP
97%
Volatility
Medium
Max Win
Provider
BGaming

A 97.0% RTP headlines Chupito De Pollo 2 — a full point above the 96% most releases settle at. BGaming's sequel keeps the Spanish bar humor of the original; the title translates as "chicken shot." As with other BGaming titles, operators can run alternate RTP builds, so 97.0% is the default figure worth confirming in-lobby.

How Chupito De Pollo 2 plays

Chupito De Pollo 2 runs a balanced medium-variance profile, the pacing most players default to. Wins arrive often enough to keep a session alive without the punishing droughts of a high-variance title.

Is 97.0% a good RTP?

At 97.0%, Chupito De Pollo 2 returns noticeably more than the ~96% industry average. Over a long run that edge matters, and it's a genuine mark in the game's favour. Bear in mind RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a promise for any single session.

Who should play it

Chupito De Pollo 2 is an easy all-rounder — enough action for most players without demanding a specialist's bankroll or nerve. A sensible pick if you're not chasing extremes in either direction.

What we liked

  • Above-average 97.0% RTP
  • A balanced rhythm of pays (medium volatility)
  • From BGaming, a studio we rate

Worth knowing

  • Medium-volatility play: neither the calmest nor the wildest ride
  • Bonus features can be slow to trigger

Want to try Chupito De Pollo 2 in demo or real-money mode?

Play at Casumo →

Frequently asked questions

What is the RTP of Chupito De Pollo 2?
Chupito De Pollo 2 has a published return-to-player (RTP) of 97.0%.
What is the volatility of Chupito De Pollo 2?
Chupito De Pollo 2 is a medium-volatility slot, meaning a balanced rhythm of pays.
Who makes Chupito De Pollo 2?
Chupito De Pollo 2 is developed by BGaming.

How we review: we verify each game's RTP, volatility and maximum win against provider data, then assess variance, features and value. Ratings reflect our editorial judgement, not commercial arrangements. Read our full methodology →