HomeSlots › Mongol Treasures
Endorphina

Mongol Treasures Slot Review

★★★★★ 4.5 / 5 — our rating
DRReviewed by Daniel Roth, Slots Editor · Updated 13 Aug 2026
RTP
96.05%
Volatility
High
Max Win
Provider
Endorphina

Genghis-era plunder and steppe conquest give this Endorphina release its identity. The 96.05% RTP sits a shade above the common 96% baseline. Volatility runs high, so sessions swing hard — sparse hits, heavier payouts when they connect — which makes longer bankrolls the practical fit and short punts a fast way to feel the drought.

How Mongol Treasures plays

Expect swings from Mongol Treasures. High volatility means the base game can feel thin, with the real damage — in both directions — done when the features finally land.

Is 96.05% a good RTP?

96.05% puts Mongol Treasures right on the industry standard of around 96% — a fair, typical return with no nasty surprises in the maths. Bear in mind RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a promise for any single session.

Who should play it

Mongol Treasures is aimed at players who chase the big multiplier and can stomach the dry spells to get there. If losing streaks tilt you, a lower-variance title on this list will feel better.

What we liked

  • Solid 96.05% RTP, at or above standard
  • Bigger, less frequent wins (high volatility)
  • From Endorphina, a studio we rate

Worth knowing

  • High-volatility play: swings can be sharp — bankroll accordingly
  • Base-game pays can feel thin between features

Want to try Mongol Treasures in demo or real-money mode?

Play at Casumo →

Frequently asked questions

What is the RTP of Mongol Treasures?
Mongol Treasures has a published return-to-player (RTP) of 96.05%.
What is the volatility of Mongol Treasures?
Mongol Treasures is a high-volatility slot, meaning bigger, less frequent wins.
Who makes Mongol Treasures?
Mongol Treasures is developed by Endorphina.

How we review: we verify each game's RTP, volatility and maximum win against provider data, then assess variance, features and value. Ratings reflect our editorial judgement, not commercial arrangements. Read our full methodology →